|
Post by Chilehead on Sept 6, 2009 21:25:59 GMT -5
Her hair was different?
Her shirt was on backwards or inside out?
|
|
|
Post by Wormopolis on Sept 7, 2009 10:36:18 GMT -5
she didnt use to know where the kitchen was, so some guy MUST have been banging her in order for her to venture in there.
|
|
|
Post by ken on Sept 7, 2009 15:45:12 GMT -5
All not correct... Think leggs...
|
|
|
Post by Chilehead on Sept 8, 2009 13:47:43 GMT -5
She was wearing panty hose when she left and not when she got home or vice versa?
|
|
|
Post by ken on Sept 8, 2009 16:25:20 GMT -5
very close.. But they where stockings. And what happens to them?
|
|
|
Post by Chilehead on Sept 8, 2009 16:39:51 GMT -5
They were off, inside out, backwards, or had a runner?
|
|
|
Post by ken on Sept 8, 2009 17:12:17 GMT -5
Close enough.. She had a run in her right stocking when she left..When she returned it was on the left..
|
|
|
Post by Wormopolis on Sept 10, 2009 3:53:52 GMT -5
that was one of those that couldnt be figured out from the original riddle and required asking a bunch of questions...
we should come up with a name for those kind...
|
|
|
Post by Chilehead on Sept 10, 2009 8:38:35 GMT -5
Close enough.. She had a run in her right stocking when she left..When she returned it was on the left.. Which means: She had them on backwards.
|
|
|
Post by Osprey on Sept 10, 2009 11:48:16 GMT -5
Close enough.. She had a run in her right stocking when she left..When she returned it was on the left.. Which means: She had them on backwards. Not necessarily... if they were the all-in-one pantyhose type, yes, they would be on backwards. But, if they were true stockings then she could have put them on different legs.
|
|
|
Post by Chilehead on Sept 11, 2009 0:32:03 GMT -5
Got me there, Osprey. Hadn't thought about that one. Good call.
|
|